death and APRs

11232021-45

— पाँच हजार सात सौ छियासठ —

Shobhit has pushed comfortably past Laney in the Winter Social Review points, and yet he remains obsessed with getting as many points as possible. I think he wants to pull way ahead of it, which is probably not especially realistic.

Still, he suggested we walk to Salt & Straw last night for dessert, for this very reason. We went back and forth slightly as to whether to go there or to Voodoo Doughnut where I still have two free doughnut coupons to use. But, the pull at Salt & Straw is always their monthly seasonal flavors, and we hadn't gone there in February yet. So Salt & Straw it was.

For the second time, we both sampled every one of their seasonal flavors before deciding on what to buy. In the end we got a single scoop cup split with two different flavors, both of which I really loved: a salted chocolate flavor with chunks of brownie in it; and a holdover from a previous month, an eggnog flavor spiked with tequila—something I had never heard of before but which I was amazed by when I sampled it. Shobhit liked the chocolate one much more than the eggnog but I really loved them both, with a slight preference for the eggnog. Knowing how much I love eggnog, Shobhit just said, "Of course. It's eggnog."

We ate it with our two separate spoons while we walked back home.

Otherwise we had tacos for dinner—all of the filling already prepared by Shobhit before I got home from work—and otherwise watched three episodes of season 2 of Severance, which is top notch: two episodes before going for ice cream and one more episode after we got back. We're all caught up on the current season now, with four episodes left and the next one releasing on Friday.

— पाँच हजार सात सौ छियासठ —

12042024-60

— पाँच हजार सात सौ छियासठ —

I had my 2024 Annual Performance Review late this morning. It was a one-hour meeting with Gabby in the four-person conference room on the other side of two rows of two desks each to my left. She had what I can only assume was her APR with Amy in the same room the hour immediately prior.

Gabby likes to send the completed form to us via email a day before the meeting, just so there are no surprises. I appreciate this. Although I have to admit misinterpreting it at first: she ban the document with my self-assessment, the "Individual Performance Review" (IPR). In that, I rated myself Meets Expectations, and at first I thought I was looking at Gabby's rating. I was kind of like: ...Oh.

It was dumb. She actually gave me an overall rating of Exceeds Expectations. That was at the end of the entire document, where her pages began after the last page of my IPR.

She did vary the ratings among five categories that average to the overall rating, though. There are only three options: Below Expectations; Meets Expectations; and Above Expectations. Thankfully I was not rated Below Expectations in anything, but I did get a mere Meets Expectations for "Collaborates" and "Focuses on the Customer." I'm perfectly comfortable with that, honestly. Where I got Above Expectations was for "Demonstrates Kindness" (the one part of this very corporatized APR process still reflects PCC's definitively hippie roots—not to diminish its importance, mind you); "Instills Trust" and "Values Diversity." It's convenient that these five things are given equal weight, given that the two I got Meets Expectations on are tied to the bottom line in a way the other three clearly aren't.

Gabby had plenty to say when it came to "Opportunities for Improvement," none of which was in any way vicious or even unfair (I will admit to being ever-so slightly defensive when I first read the document), with a lot of specific suggestions where how realistic they are may be somewhat debatable. But, we'll see. I'll be open minded.

It started with the positive, which is clearly by design. Gabby was very generous with what she listed as my "key accomplishments." She did ask me to start the meeting by going over my IPR with her, though, which I wasn't super comfortable with. I had already written it all down, after all. She did mention that I don't necessarily have to come up with five different things under both sections ("Key Accomplishments" and "Opportunities for Improvement"), given that I kind of struggled to flesh out each list.

I did mention during the meeting that I'm not a huge fan of this whole process. "I know you aren't," she said. We've discussed this stuff before. And I won't even say that it's useless. Obviously there is value in knowing how well you are doing at your job. I just can't help but bristle at the deeply structured nature of it all, in a way that makes it very difficult to defend against the perception of PCC "going corporate" in the way that I used to.

Gabby, for her part, has held corporate jobs since she was 20 years old. She's perfectly comfortable with processes like these, and so far as I can tell, is both earnest and sincere when it comes to her involvement and approach. I don't begrudge her or judge her for that, either. By all accounts, even where PCC is now, far more "corporate" than ever, is likely pretty lax and chill compared to the annual cycle of corporate conventions she no doubt got very used to at places like Starbucks or Amazon. I see that as a key difference, though: the kind of pointedly independent spirit that drove PCC as an organization twenty years ago is no longer the same. And I fully understand that much of that is by necessity: you have to add things like middle management when you undergo significant expansion. It's just the nature of business growth.

It all comes back to capitalism, really. The thing that will one day be the death of us all. It's tempting to say that it'll be climate change. No, climate change will be the blunt instrument, the tool wielded—by capitalism.

This is a little ridiculous, isn't it? This hyperbolic diatribe as a result of nothing more than my honestly only moderate irritation with corporate structures and conventions—specifically, Annual Performance Reviews (APRs). We drew up a list of "2025 goals" too: another thing I struggle to subscribe to even though they can also be genuinely useful. I don't know what my problem is. On the plus side, the evaluation is over and now I don't really have to worry about it for another year.

— पाँच हजार सात सौ छियासठ —

12042024-69

[posted 12:54pm]

APR Valentine

02282023-78

— पाँच हजार पाँच सौ पैंसठ —

Boy, am I a dummy! I wrote yesterday all about the Social Review points Shobhit will soon be getting to pull further ahead of Laney on the next rankings, and I didn't even think to mention the dinner plans we had last night. It was Valentine's Day, for fuck's sake!

Here's what amuses me the most about the fact that we actually went out for dinner on Valentine's Day this year—for the first time since 2020, incidentally (and technically that year we went out to breakfast): we went all the way across the street: to a new-ish restaurant on that corner of 15th & Pine, called Kedai Makan. There have been several different restaurants in that business unit of the Vox Apartments, since it was costructed a decade ago; our server—who informed us she's lived in the Vox Apartments building itself for three years—said Kedai Makan opened about a year ago.

Kedai Makan means "Wok House" in Hindi, by the way. We asked our server and she confirmed it means the same thing in Malay. (This is a Malaysian restaurant.) This made sense to Shobhit, as he noted—and I never knew this—that Malaysia is largely made up, ethnically, of Indian (South Asian) people. In fact he posited that it's about a third Indian, but apparently it's only about 7% people of Indian descent, compared to 23% Chinese, as the major minority ethnic groups; 70% of the population is "Bumiputera" or Malay. Still, with a relatively significant Indian minority, it makes sense for there to be some crossover in language.

The most important thing I have to say about Kedai Makan is about the food, which was fucking amazing. The place is pricey, with entrees all being about $18 or more, and I budgeted $50 for this dinner—we ordered one entree, one side, one salad, and no drinks: the total with tip still came to just barely over $50.

They do have a Happy Hour though, which makes it possible to eat there a bit more reasonably, and I now hope to return with Laney for Happy Hour sometime. The "mango salad" was too spicy for me, but the "Nasi Biryani" dish and especially the "Roti Jala" side were both phenomenal. I want to go back just to get the Roti Jala with a side of rice. Oh my god, I'm in escasy just remembering it.

We were in and out pretty quick, actually. I made reservations weeks ago, knowing that's the only way to do it for Valentine's Day, for 6:30. When we got over there the place was nearly full, the few empty tables all reserved. I only saw two or three empty tables, all of them two-tops. When we were first guided to the one on the upper level, Shobhit pointed to the one down on the lower level and asked if we could have that, so we'd have a view of our building across the street through the window. That table was already reserved but the hostess managed to rearrange information on her handheld tablet and got us the table we wanted.

I would guess we were there for 45 minutes at most. We practically inhaled that food. When we were done, we went right across the street and for the first time went into the current interation of the business tentant on that corner of our building, which has also been countless different things over the years: Coche Valley Dessert Cafe. This place was last a bubble tea cafe, run by the lady who owns the unit; the same lady owns the unit now but closed the business and this other lady opened the desserr cafe, which is mostly desert crepes.

I had wanted to try it for a while, so I agreed when Shobhit suggested it after dinner last night, even though, stupidly, I went kind of hog wild on pastry and cookie samples all day at work yesterday. Fucking get ahold of yourself, Matthew!

At least Shobhit and I split the strawberry cheesecake crepe. It was also delicious. And, now that the Pappy Van Winkle whisley has been opened, we had some more of that. Funny how Shobhit waited four years for a "special occasion" to open it to begin with (last month we paid off the mortgage), but Valentine's Day the next month was enough of an excuse to have more of it.

A coworker of Shobhit's at Total Wine said it was likely to taste better a while after the bottle was opened, as we didn't think it was that great to begin with, and it does make sense for Shobhit to want to put that to the test. He declared last night that it was indeed better. Whiskey is very much a "take it or leave it" booze for me, so I thought it was . . . fine. Shobhit, for his part, is enamored with the enormous market value of this brand of whiskey. I don't care that much.

Once we finished with dessert, we found something new to watch, and we burned through half the season of Percy Jackson and the Olympians on Disney+. We're both into it because the story is compelling, but damn, is the acting bad. It feels like they spent no time rehearsing and then did every scene in one take.

— पाँच हजार पाँच सौ पैंसठ —

02282023-79

— पाँच हजार पाँच सौ पैंसठ —

In completely unrelated news, except that this was the first time I had one on Valentine's Day, yesterday afternoon was my first annual performance review (APR—where would we be without acronyms!) exclusively with Gabby. Last year she had just started—apparently just a few days ago Justine too Gabby out to lunch to celebrate her one-year anniversary—and she simply sat in with Eric as he went through it.

Like last year, between the three options of "Below Expectations," "Meets Expectations," and "Above Expectations," I got "Above Expectations." Unlike any year or any other performance review in my life, Gabby actually sent me her completed evaluation on Tuesday so I could read over it before we met. This is the kind of thing, among many things really, that sets her apart as a manager. And you know what? She's already brainstorming ways I could evolve my role or grow what my position is, in spite of my longtime assertion that I have no ambition (I really don't), but if any role change were in the cards, I would be significantly less inclined to go for it if it meant I had to have a different boss. I suppose it would also depend on the position, but still. I don't know. I'm still not especially eager for a massive shift in my responsibilities. Although to Gabby's point, it's kind of been happening a bit organically over the past year anyway.

We always also have to fill out a self-evaluation, which we send in ahead of time. Gabby seemed genuinely mystified as to why I would not have rated myself as "Above Expectations"—another first. There are actually three reasons for this. First and foremost, the way I see it, I do the job that is expected, and don't make any huge effort, at least not consciously, to do more: I never regard my performance as "above and beyond," the consistency of open love I get from brokers (and sometimes POS people) notwithstanding. That only makes me think it's sad all the other people they work with are dipshits, not that I'm genuinely some superstar. And I say this as someone with no problem whatsoever openly regarding myself as a wonderful person with a sterling personality.

Second, there's the point Alexia often makes when talking about this: if she does a performance review for someone that is "above expectations," that just means a new bar has been set. If the next year that same bar is met, then from that point forward it's "Meets Expectations." I actually explained this to Gabby and she was pretty skeptical of it as a point of view. Never mind that I got the feeling she felt I actually did exceed whatever bar I may have set last year (maybe I did, I genuinely don't spend a lot of time thinking about it); I think she essentially rejects it as a premise.

That said, Gabby is also just very generous. I do trust she would talk to me about anything she felt I was doing that she thought was not up to par, but I also sort of feel like we have somewhat differing definitions of what "expectations" are. That said, to the third reason: I am never above beying tactical in these matters. Rating myself lower than I can fairly easily predict my manager will rate me is simply the smarter play.

But, you know, overall: whatever. Gabby had scheduled her APR with Amy the hour before she scheduled mine, and they were done in half an hour. She messaged me to ask if I wanted to start early, so I went right over to the small meeting room she was in, at about 1:35. I have already publicly noted that the upside of performance reviews is getting the chance to just sit and talk about me—in that original post, I said "for forty minutes." Yesterday we had pretty productive conversation for nearly ninety minutes, finally breaking at the actually-scheduled end time of 3:00.

It went about as well as I expected, honestly—which is to say, quite well. Any evaluation form prompts for Gabby to offer "constructive criticism" was honestly a bit milktoast. And I am down with that. Truthfully, the biggest takeaway from that meeting is that I am already "growing in my role" more than I even realized. Gabby even said she's had other people compliment how much more involved I seem to be lately. As much as I genuinely have a tendency to assume people are saying good things about me behind my back (a potentially dangerous ongoing assumption to make, but take it from me, it's a great way to live), I must admit some skepticism that there have been many instances of this specific sort of thing. It's not like I think she's lying about it, because I don't. She could be slightly exaggerating. I only say this because it's difficult for me to see it, which is maybe a me problem.

Overall, there is also a slight sense of relief at finally having a first full-on APR with my most recent manager (a term I never used before but which Gabby uses a lot; she certainly seems to prefer it over "boss" and I've never heard her say "supervisor"), having no idea before she was hired whether I'd get a new boss who was a pain in the ass in some way or another. I told her I debated whether to tell her about this, but then went ahead and did it, telling her the horrid experience of my six-month evaluation all the way back in 2003, when I was completely blindsided and given the weekend to consider whether I wanted to stay or quit the job, with no warning before that Friday that such a thing was coming. Gabby, whose approach all along has been the polar opposite of this, was flabbergasted by the whole story. (She also had a similar, and arguably worse, story of her own from her Amazon days.) I now have years and years of consistently great performance reviews, but because of that first one more than 20 years ago, I stil get this slight sort of ball in my stomach every year when they come around again. I think they actually have proved useful, but I would sure love it if I never had to deal with them. And it's all just because of that experience in 2003, which is a little bit ridiculous.

On the upside, great as it was, the APR for this year is all over now, and we can just move things along. Onward!

— पाँच हजार पाँच सौ पैंसठ —

02282023-86

[posted 12:31 pm]