Thu, 12:01: This is a historic moment worthy of celebration. It should still be noted, however—and yes, even in the same breath—that similar legislation regarding reproductive choice is just as important, arguably even more so. The fact that it faces greater resistance right now doesn't change the fact that Congress should have similarly codified Roe v. Wade ages ago, when they actually could, but did not because the naively felt it faced no real threat. We need to be better than that going forward—which this legislation illustrates as a step in that direction. But reproductive choice should still be very much in the conversation here. House passes landmark legislation to protect same-sex, interracial marriages
