big jump

12252025-03

— पांच हजार नौ सौ तैंतीस —

I don't know why I do this to myself, but I do it every year—evidently more so this year than ever before, however: I am near completion of my "2025 in Ten Minutes" video. I was up working on it until 12:30 last night. Mind you, I worked on it almost non-stop from the time I got home from work at 5:00. I took a break from it once to prepare my dinner, and once to make myself hot chocolate. I melted a small candy cane into it. It was a rainbow colored candy cane so I'm not certain if it would have been quite as pepperminty as it would have been with a conventional candy cane, but it was pretty tasty.

Shobhit FaceTimed me for a few minutes from India. I got kind of unfairly testy with him, as I was trying so hard to get as much as I could done on the video. I need to learn how to repeat myself due to his hearing difficulty without yelling. "Do you have to yell?" he asked, smartly without being testy himself (pretty impressive for him, to be honest). No, no I do not. He let me go shortly after that so I could focus.

I discovered some new features in iMovie this year, which proved super helpful in cramming the massive amount of clips and photos I selected for the 2025 video. I can do picture-within-a-picture; I can overlap two images (either photo or video in either case) with one lessened to any level of opacity I want; I can do split screen (either vertical or horizontal). This year's video is going to feature a lot of all of these things.

Has iMovie always had these features and I am only now discovering them? I just googled it: apparently it's had the split screen feature since 2010. Fifteen years! Jesus Christ. I should dig more into what features I've been missing all this time. I do know it still has annoying limitations when it comes to titles.

Anyway, being able to double up in this way, effectively finding ways to show two clips concurrently, is kind of a mixed bag. It contributes to short attention span and over-stimulation in a way I'm not crazy about. But, it also saves a ton of time, especially when it's a challenge to edit down for time—because Flickr has a 10-minute limit, I always keep my annual videos at that length. I don't want to ask more of people's time than that anyway.

In fact, when I had my first rough project with all the photos and video clips added before editing anything down, the video was at a solid 30 minutes. I needed to get it down to a third of that, and I was really afraid it would be difficult. But with all these tools and tricks I never used before, by the time I was done with the first round of edits, the length was all the way back down to 8 minutes and 30 seconds! I was like: well shit, I can expand some of this now! I never had that experience before.

Anyway, the project still needs at least one last music track added, and then some final tweaks on certain photo-inset sizes, that kind of thing. I'm seeing a movie right after work today with Alexia, which is really going to cut into my available time tonight, but with all I managed to get done yesterday, with what amounted to at least six solid hours of work, what I have left shouldn't take nearly as much time. I think I should still be able to share the video tomorrow morning, on schedule.

I do need to learn to take the same approach with this video as I do my Book Log, though, and contribute to the project throughout the year as opposed to doing it all at once over just a few days at the end of the year, against a tight deadline. This will allow me to make something much better and more satisfying anyway.

— पांच हजार नौ सौ तैंतीस —

12232025-89

— पांच हजार नौ सौ तैंतीस —

In other news, I am kind of deliberately buring the lede here. Gabby scheduled a kind of impromptu 1:1 meeting this morning, even though we had already canceled what had originally been scheduled for Friday because she's going to be in Costa Rica for a couple of weeks.

She gave me a heads up a month or so ago that she was working on getting me a promotion—critically, in name only (but also with an accompanying raise), reflecting the work I am already doing. She wanted to make sure I didn't feel like she wasn't listening to her, because I have said from the start that I don't want a promotion. But, if you offer one that does not require new major responsibilities, and comes with a raise to boot? I'm not going to complain about that. She told me she wouldn't know for sure if it was official until the end of the year.

There has been a fair amount of talk recently about tightening of budget, so I did ask her in a meeting a couple of months ago if I should maybe not get my hopes up about this. I hadn't brought it up since she first told me, but this seemed worth asking. She told me she was afraid I might wonder about that after all the budget-talk, and she said: "I still can't say anything, but you should not lower your hopes."

When she scheduled our meeting this morning, she suggested we take the meeting at Fonté Bar out on the second level, upstairs here in the Rainier Square lobby. She said she was craving a peppermint hot chocolate. Some mildly amusing serendipity there. I knew then that I must be getting the news now. I won't lie, it did cross my mind, very briefly, that it could be a "condolence hot chocolate," but I know that was not at all likely.

They apparently cannot officially announce promotions until after the new year, and since Gabby is on her trip from the 2nd until the 12th, she told me I can't go around telling everyone about this now—though she did say it would not be big deal if there were a few individuals I shared it with. But, for this reason, I won't yet get into the specifics of how much the raise is, except to say this: it will be the largest raise I have gotten in 16 years.

I really thought it was going to be the largest raise I've ever had, but I just checked the spreadsheet I have that details my wage increases by year. And actually, this is only the third-largest raise I've gotten. I'm not going to be disappointed by that, though. Those two raises that were higher (I once got a 16.55% raise, in 2008) date from well before Cate the CEO changed everything about how PCC works, and gave all the proceedings a much more corpratized kind of bureaucracy to it. I knew that I would never, ever get a raise like that in this new reality without a promotion—and this is the first promotion I have ever gotten, at any job. I've had three job title changes already over my 23 years here, but none of those coincided with raises and none were actually promotions.

All of this is to say: ever since PCC sort of hardened and clarified its policies on personnel matters, within that context, this is by a gigantic margin the largest raise I've gotten—I have only gotten cost-of-living, or slightly higher than cost-of-living, increases every years since 2013. I got a quite-significant raise in 2012, and this will be a bit larger than that, percentage-wise (0.7% larger, to be specific). Since then, the largest wage increase I have gotten was in 2023, and next year's raise will be 8.29% higher than that.

Anyway. I suppose I can share my new title. Right now it's "Center Store Support Specialist," what I've been officially since 2016, and by a pretty wide margin my least favorite of the four titles I've had here. As of next year, it will be "Pricing Analyst." This is very similar to the title Amy has had for a couple of years now, which is "Pricing & Promotions Analyst." I don't have a clue how much she makes but I can probably assume I already made more just by virtue of my longevity here, which has always been a major factor in how much I make relative to the actual work I do. Although I suppose I should probably not sell myself short in terms of the value of my institutional knowledge, which I am tasked with sharing quite regularly anymore.

I did surprise myself to have discovered this will be my third-highest raise and not the highest one ever, but after years of smaller increases, it will result in by far the most extra actual dollars in my paycheck. The new wage kicks in as of the 2nd, which means my second paycheck in January will cover one week with the old wage and one week with the new; I won't be able to fully finalize my 2026 budget until getting my 1/30 paycheck and then also my 2/13 paycheck, as the checks are also different between two each month due to only one of them getting a monthly deduction for my Orca Card. But I'm not complaining!

I'm thrilled. I thanked Gabby multiple times, and she said a lot about how valuable I am here. This is my favorite thing about this job, how valued I have felt for decades. That kind of thing means a lot.

— पांच हजार नौ सौ तैंतीस —

12282025-48

[posted 12:35pm]

raise ervation

01012023-18

— पांच हजार तीन सौ उनतालीस —

I suppose the most significant news from the past 24 hours is my meeting with Eric, who is only officially still my supervisor until next month. He applied for, and got, a Senior Financial Analyst position, and I guess a new person replacing him in his current position should be coming in the next few to several weeks. Eric will be having to spend a lot of time training that person though.

For now, he's still my supervisor. I still need to fill out a self-evaluation by Thursday next week, for what will now be the final performance review he does for me this year. Next year: yet another new person with their own ideas of how well I do my job. I guess we'll cross those bridges when we get to them.

Most importantly, yesterday Eric informed me that I will be getting a 4% raise. Washington State has a new-ish law that all minimum wage must be raised every year in proportion to inflation, which meant the state minimum wage increased on January 1 by 8.63%. Shobhit had this wild hope that I would get the same percentage increase, which I knew would never happen. Seattle proper's minimum wage is even higher, now $18.69, but I still make roughly double that—and if PCC had to raise all their salaries by more than 8%, that would be a gargantuan expense. And they've been talking for two years about the hit they took having to add $4 an hour for hazard pay through the pandemic, so I knew there was no way they would ever offer me the same percent increase as they were required by law to give anyone making minimum wage.

I suppose, by some measures, given all of that, 4% is "generous." It's half a percent more than I got last year, actually. Of course, it's still only "generous" in that they didn't give me as little a bump as they could have. And at 4%, functionally speaking with nearly 9% inflation, I am effectively enduring a pay cut. Fun!

On top of that, I can't cash out PTO at the end of the year anymore. That's another huge hit, on top of all this. With my 2023 budget, I am adding temporary budget items so that I set aside enough from every paycheck that I can spend about the same as I usually do every year, to cover calendars and Christmas shopping. I've decided to do the same, as a separate budget line item, for potential Christmas events I might want to buy tickets to. This way I'll have about $700 earmarked for Christmas spending needs by mid-November.

I still don’t know how my take-home paycheck amounts will be affected, as today was the first paycheck of the year; my raise won't be reflected until the next one, on January 20; there has been a slight decrease in the deduction for my annual Orca Card pass but there will be a notable change due to my switching from $1000 to $150 annually contributed to my FSA card. I'll have a crown I have to pay half of out of pocket at the dentist this month alone, but at least I'll be able to use money that was transferred pre-tax. Shobhit is also encouraging me, for the first time, to change my tax deduction code so I get more per paycheck and the tax return next year will thus be smaller. I'm still looking into making that part happen.

And, of course, all of this will be factored in when we reassess after our return from Australia in March, to determine what else we can afford to do over the rest of the year, in terms of any other trips taken anywhere.

— पांच हजार तीन सौ उनतालीस —

01012023-23

— पांच हजार तीन सौ उनतालीस —

As for last night, I took myself to see a movie: MEGAN, about a killer AI robot doll. I had thought I could see Women Talking last night since its official opening is today, but it's only playing at SIFF Cinemas so they have no Thursday night showings like the big multiplexes do. I'll see that one tonight.

Anyway, this was the first movie I was able to see this year, and I had just gone online to see what options there were. This seemed to be the best option, and when I saw its MetaScore at Metacritic.com was 73, I was surprised to discover it was getting a generally positive response. So, I was like, okay I'll see that then.

It was nothing special, but it was fun. It cost me nothing more than seeing anything else using my monthly AMC subscription would, so it was worth the price. Solid B movie. In more than one respect.

Having just missed any relevant busses when the movie let out, I had to walk home. I took longer than desired to write the review, only because it took me so long to find a screenshot I was satisfied with. As a result, it was nearly 9:00 by the time I had it posted, and then Shobhit wanted to talk about my budget for 2023. That took a while, and then we both got into bed to read for a bit, until he zonked out before even I did.

— पांच हजार तीन सौ उनतालीस —

12312022-59

[posted 12:28 pm]