raise ervation

01012023-18

— पांच हजार तीन सौ उनतालीस —

I suppose the most significant news from the past 24 hours is my meeting with Eric, who is only officially still my supervisor until next month. He applied for, and got, a Senior Financial Analyst position, and I guess a new person replacing him in his current position should be coming in the next few to several weeks. Eric will be having to spend a lot of time training that person though.

For now, he's still my supervisor. I still need to fill out a self-evaluation by Thursday next week, for what will now be the final performance review he does for me this year. Next year: yet another new person with their own ideas of how well I do my job. I guess we'll cross those bridges when we get to them.

Most importantly, yesterday Eric informed me that I will be getting a 4% raise. Washington State has a new-ish law that all minimum wage must be raised every year in proportion to inflation, which meant the state minimum wage increased on January 1 by 8.63%. Shobhit had this wild hope that I would get the same percentage increase, which I knew would never happen. Seattle proper's minimum wage is even higher, now $18.69, but I still make roughly double that—and if PCC had to raise all their salaries by more than 8%, that would be a gargantuan expense. And they've been talking for two years about the hit they took having to add $4 an hour for hazard pay through the pandemic, so I knew there was no way they would ever offer me the same percent increase as they were required by law to give anyone making minimum wage.

I suppose, by some measures, given all of that, 4% is "generous." It's half a percent more than I got last year, actually. Of course, it's still only "generous" in that they didn't give me as little a bump as they could have. And at 4%, functionally speaking with nearly 9% inflation, I am effectively enduring a pay cut. Fun!

On top of that, I can't cash out PTO at the end of the year anymore. That's another huge hit, on top of all this. With my 2023 budget, I am adding temporary budget items so that I set aside enough from every paycheck that I can spend about the same as I usually do every year, to cover calendars and Christmas shopping. I've decided to do the same, as a separate budget line item, for potential Christmas events I might want to buy tickets to. This way I'll have about $700 earmarked for Christmas spending needs by mid-November.

I still don’t know how my take-home paycheck amounts will be affected, as today was the first paycheck of the year; my raise won't be reflected until the next one, on January 20; there has been a slight decrease in the deduction for my annual Orca Card pass but there will be a notable change due to my switching from $1000 to $150 annually contributed to my FSA card. I'll have a crown I have to pay half of out of pocket at the dentist this month alone, but at least I'll be able to use money that was transferred pre-tax. Shobhit is also encouraging me, for the first time, to change my tax deduction code so I get more per paycheck and the tax return next year will thus be smaller. I'm still looking into making that part happen.

And, of course, all of this will be factored in when we reassess after our return from Australia in March, to determine what else we can afford to do over the rest of the year, in terms of any other trips taken anywhere.

— पांच हजार तीन सौ उनतालीस —

01012023-23

— पांच हजार तीन सौ उनतालीस —

As for last night, I took myself to see a movie: MEGAN, about a killer AI robot doll. I had thought I could see Women Talking last night since its official opening is today, but it's only playing at SIFF Cinemas so they have no Thursday night showings like the big multiplexes do. I'll see that one tonight.

Anyway, this was the first movie I was able to see this year, and I had just gone online to see what options there were. This seemed to be the best option, and when I saw its MetaScore at Metacritic.com was 73, I was surprised to discover it was getting a generally positive response. So, I was like, okay I'll see that then.

It was nothing special, but it was fun. It cost me nothing more than seeing anything else using my monthly AMC subscription would, so it was worth the price. Solid B movie. In more than one respect.

Having just missed any relevant busses when the movie let out, I had to walk home. I took longer than desired to write the review, only because it took me so long to find a screenshot I was satisfied with. As a result, it was nearly 9:00 by the time I had it posted, and then Shobhit wanted to talk about my budget for 2023. That took a while, and then we both got into bed to read for a bit, until he zonked out before even I did.

— पांच हजार तीन सौ उनतालीस —

12312022-59

[posted 12:28 pm]

raise ignation

12292021-06

— पांच हजार एक सौ दस —

Well, I'm kind of nervous about our tests again, thanks to this TikTok video by gynecological surgeon Karen Tang, who, for the record, I don't follow because she's a gynecologist, but because she is one of the many doctors and epidemiologists I follow who post a lot about Covid and who spend a lot of TikTok time battling Covid misinformation. (Side note: Shobhit loves to characterize my time spent on TikTok as completely wasteful, but he's willfully ignoring how much useful information I get there, from both doctors and social justice activists, particularly Black ones. Literally none of that is wasteful.)

Anyway, she's tested positive for Covid, and I wasn't struck as much by the content of the video, even though a lot of that is certainly salient, about the difficulty of getting tested, and about how the current surge is once again forcing the diversion, delay, or cancelation of other critical medical care that has nothing to do with Covid. The broader point of the video is yet another message about how critical it is to get vaccinated and do your part for the community, something health care workers have been shouting into the wind for two years now.

What shook me more, honestly, was in the comments. Dr. Tang responded to several people's supportive comments, and in one she wrote, "I had 2 neg rapids before having a + PCR!"

It was kind of hard to read that, after Shobhit and I both got negative results from the rapid tests yesterday morning but are still waiting for the PCR results, which we almost certainly won't get until the beginning of next week at the earliest. I find myself wondering, when the nurse told us yesterday that the rapid tests are 85% accurate, what is that figure based on? Does that include Omicron detection? I assume so, but I should have asked. I mean, even if it does, Dr. Tang could easily have just been among those 15%, and that doesn't mean we also will be. There is her statement, though, that she tested negative on rapid tests twice. And now, she's home sick—albeit clearly quite mild, like a common cold in her case (which is not the case for everyone, it cannot be stressed enough! Tracy was laid out since last Friday, although she was not boosted and Dr. Tang was). On the other hand, it's another salient point that she works in a hospital.

This shit can really make your brain whip back and forth, though. I mean, Ivan doesn't work in a hospital, but he is a nurse at a rehabilitation facility. He's massively covered in PPE at all his shifts, right down to a face shield over his mask that he says no other place he's worked at has required. I'm sure Dr. Tang was too, although I have no idea if the face shield was added for her (face shields make little difference anyway). Ivan gets tested at work twice a week, every Tuesday and Friday if I remember right, but those are always rapid tests, never PCR tests. I have a feeling he won't get a PCR test unless he ever starts developing symptoms.

And then there's Shobhit, easily facing the most risk of all three of us, and thus posing the biggest threat to both Ivan and me should Shobhit come home with something, because he works retail every day and he isn't even wearing N95 masks. I wish he would.

Oh. And I haven't even yet mentioned the most disturbing thing I saw Dr. Tang say in the comments! When one person commented asking how she got it, she replied, "Omicron is super contagious, and I'm a doctor working in a hospital. I wear a mask everywhere. Short of never leaving your house, you'll be exposed." Yikes. I mean, I really knew that already, but it was a bit of a jolt seeing it so clearly stated in print.

And speaking of exposures, Washington State Governor Jay Inslee held a press conference yesterday afternoon, which I watched or listened to a fair amount of while I was working. After Shobhit and I have both gotten two exposure notices each on our phones (so far), one of the reporters asking Governor Inslee questions was asking about testing capacity and limitations, and he referenced the guideline of getting tested if exposed, "with people getting phone notifications left and right." So, clearly Shobhit and I are not the only ones in that boat.

And that brings me to the office work from home policy. We got an update from the VP of HR yesterday, and I found the messaging to be a little inconsistent with what Darrell, VP of Merchandising and Marketing, sent out to Merchandising last week, in which he said, "With the rise in COVID cases due to the omicron variant I would like to ask everyone who can work at home to work at home," and "If you need to be in the office I would advise you to wear a mask unless you’re actively eating or drinking." This came on Wednesday afternoon and I worked all day at the office in a mask on Thursday, was off work for the holiday on Friday, took my laptop and keyboard etc. home over the weekend, and have been working from home since.

All reasonable, honestly. But then the email from Dana in HR yesterday said this:

o The office remains open. You may work remotely if your job allows (talk with your direct supervisor) or from the office at your own discretion.
o If you choose to work from the office, please do what feels comfortable for you in terms of social distancing and mask wearing.
o We recommend that large group meetings or celebrations be moved to virtual rather than in-person.

Now, Darrell's email had said "Also please postpone any in person meetings or gatherings at the office for the time being," so that was the only real consistency between the two emails. Technically Darrell did not state anything to be mandatory, and last week I was ready just to work from the office with a mask until told I had to do otherwise.

That said, the middle bit from Dana's email yesterday was kind of stunning to me. "Please do what feels comfortable for you in terms of social distancing and mask wearing?" What the fuck? She should have at least made some clarification there regarding vaccination status. Jesus Christ.

I do already miss my dual monitors at the office. It's so much easier to work with those. The TV monitor I am now using as an external screen has a very different picture quality, something that clearly works better as a TV when sitting further away; closer up the detail of lines, particularly in things like email or Excel text, has a certain lacking clarity. I kind of get used to it and I can deal for a few weeks if need be. But with each passing day I do feel more and more like working from home, for now, is for the best. The latest update for statewide transmission rates at the Seattle Times shows over 11,000 cases on January 4 alone, extending the spike so much that the line goes literally off the chart.

I am so ready to be past the peak of this wave. We aren't even there yet. I want to say this is just the beginning, but this wave really started just before Christmas. I pray this is the last huge wave we get from this fucking pandemic. The 1918 pandemic ended in about a year and a half, after three waves, with its own mutations and variants, but the difference is that pandemic killed some fifty million people, compared to about five and a half million deaths worldwide from this one—so far, anyway. We did a lot more mitigation strategies with this one though, and more successfully "flattened the curve," which I suspect is why this is still taking longer than Spanish Flu did. When you flatten the curve, you also extend its duration. The curve is spiking like nuts now though, and I am so ready for spikes like this to be a thing of the past.

Me and everyone else, right?

— पांच हजार एक सौ दस —

01012022-14

— पांच हजार एक सौ दस —

Not much else to update you on regarding the past 24 hours. Oh wait! I totally take it back. Big news! I can finally share. This has to do with PCC, the "bombshell news" I could only vaguely refer to on Monday. I received an email direct from Scott, from his and to my personal email accounts.

Just so you don't hear it on the street I gave notice today
My last day is 1/28

Scott

This was the most shocking news I have gotten at work since learning in early 2020 that Kibby had been terminated. I mean, I know it's inevitable that the longer I work here (20 years as of 2022), the more other longtime staff will fall away, either by retiring or moving on to another job. I never had any suspicion that Scott would move on to another job before retiring, though. He's worked here longer than I have.

He sent the email on Monday afternoon at 12:42 pm, during my FaceTime lunch with Karen. I didn't even see it until a quarter after 1:00. I then immediately responded.

WHAAAT

Why??

Is this related to your health issues, something else, or both?

And then this was where he started to get kind of annoyingly cagey. He really likes to be withholding of details over email. I don't think he necessarily even does it on purpose, as it's been something he's done in emails of all ranges of importance for years. He responded,

100 small reasons really. I just find now with no college to pay for I feel I can take more risk and see where that leads. I’ll be working for a startup in California do something I have done and loved and may be very profitable

I asked for clarification, wondering if he is moving to California, and then he said no, he would be working for them remotely from here in Washington. He has no plans to move, at least not until he retires.

The thing is, this will shake things up directly around me and my position, more than anything has since Stephanie left in 2011. A lot of stuff Scott has been a strong advocate for possibly has renewed vulnerability, unless both Noah and I (but mostly Noah) get more vocal with leadership ourselves. It's kind of funny too, because they just switched me back to having the Grocery Merchandiser as my direct supervisor, only to have that be Scott again for . . . a month.

I didn't even tell Tracy about this news until yesterday, after Scott told me in a Microsoft Teams meeting that it was not a secret. I didn't want to spread the news out of hand, and whether he and I immediately lose touch or not (he'll stay on my travelogue emails distribution list, so probably not), I wanted to be sure I kept the integrity of our relationship. But, after he told me it wasn't a secret, I texted Tracy, who is still exhausted from Covid and only responded with her own shock after she woke up from sleeping until well after 3:00.

I did tell Scott and Noah in the meeting that Tracy had Covid though. That might have been somewhat out of turn, but I didn't think of it as nearly as critical to keep under wraps. Most people will be getting that eventually anyway, probably.

Anyway Scott convened the Teams meeting to get both Noah and me thinking about what we need from him before he leaves. I quipped, "I think what we need is for you to tell us this is all a big joke and you're not leaving." No such luck. I did ask Noah if he's going to go for Scott's position, and he said "Of course. I've basically been doing a dry run for that position for the last seven years anyway." I bet anything Noah will indeed be the next Grocery Merchandiser (and thus the third one I work with), but that he will also still have to go through the interview process.

How Noah's position will get filled is another story. Unless it gets retooled so it does not necessitate regular visits to all fifteen stores, I won't even think about it. Shobhit was already trying to convince me to apply for it, not understanding that it would necessitate getting my own car, which I have always refused to do. Shobhit was like, "You can use mine," and . . . no. We don't even know when or if Shobhit will finally get himself another Project Manager job, or where that will be, but it will surely require the use of his car. And Shobhit doesn't seem to understand how vast the geography is now of all our store locations: as far north as Bothell; as far south as Burien (29 miles between those two stores alone); as far east as Issaquah. West to east, there's about 20 miles between West Seattle and the Issaquah store, so that covers, I suppose, 580 square miles of geographical space. Fifteen stores within that, with a sixteenth set to open Downtown January 19 (I've known this date for a couple of months but it was only made public yesterday).

The idea that I could get into Associate Merchandising, and cover all of those sixteen stores without getting a second car for which I don't even have a parking space in our building, is preposterous.

Anyway. Eric will still be doing my annual review, now scheduled on my calendar for January 27. Our weekly one-on-one Teams meetings have remained on the calendar in the meantime. Scott told me in yesterday's meeting, though, that he was already informed of what my wage increase will be in 2022. He said we'll have to set up a separate meeting to go over that, which still hasn't been done. I wonder if Eric will mention it in our meeting this afternoon? I emailed Scott to ask when our next meeting about this would be, and he eventually suggested 9:00 this morning but that never materialized. He did not that we're all getting a 3.5% raise though, so there's that.

I'm basically okay with that, even though it's complicated this year. Inflation is so out of hand right now, in terms of purchasing power it's going to be like I got a decrease in wages. You would not believe how many early 2022 cost increases I have been processing that are resulting in largely 10% retail increases. It's nuts. I knew there was no chance I'd be getting a 10% raise, so there you have it. I'm still grateful for the 3.5%. It'll work out to well over a dollar more per hour. (I'm technically salaried, but the wage is still broken down by hours on my time sheets.)

— पांच हजार एक सौ दस —

01012022-16

[posted 12:31 pm]